Rate: (3 Ratings)
While traditional understandings of the vita activa and the vita conemplativa offer contrast between what were seen as the more lowly and fleeting appetetive machinations of the life of activity versus the higher realm of the life of contemplating the eternal (essentially a monastic life), here I shall attempt to modernize. For our purposes, the vita activa indicates the life of practical action understood as engagement, whereas the vita contemplativa indicates the scholarly, dreaming, or otherwise philosophical life. To be sure, there is not a sharp line dividing the two, as scholarly activity, intellectual inquiry, is surely activity, and engagement in practical action and affairs is not always bereft of philosophical influence. For simplicity's sake though, what we will be trying to accomplish is the bridging of gaps between engagement and intellectual inquiry, especially insofar as that intellectual inquiry involves ethics and values. One could argue that today the focus of education is overly pragmatic, that it works on means via technology much more so than it inquires into ethics, values, and aesthetics. In this case, the vita contemplativa has already been subsumed under the vita activa. Indeed I think this is the case. However, in this fixation on finding solutions to practical problems, inquiry into desiderata (desired ends) has taken a backseat to the means. In other words, we have built an impressive array of technological means but the ends toward which they reach pass as presumed and abide as relatively unchallenged. The engineer doesn't necessarily inquire into why it's good to develop a "more efficient" means of mining or extracting or building this that or the other--she is only charged with doing it. It's good because some people think it's good (probably because it makes them money) and some of this "goodness" trickles down to the engineer. In this article you will learn how to recognize your own abilities to contemplate/dream and to put this into action.