Paper vs. Electronic Medical Records


Electronic medical records are the way of the future as opposed to the continued use of paper records. During the 2008 presidential campaign, then-candidate Barack Obama personally identified the need to set aside monies to help hospitals update their record retention process.


Electronic records are more efficient than paper because it makes the files easier to read, more accessible and improves the overall quality of patient files for diagnosis and research.

Paper Records

Using paper medical records increases the risk of grammar errors, improper data entry and other record inaccuracies. Paper also requires physical storage, which could be a costly expense for businesses.

Electronic Records

Electronic medical files are readily transferable from one doctor or hospital to another. Electronic filing also eliminates the physical space needed to retain patient records and facilitates more accurate documentation of medical files.

Patient Care

Electronic medical records improve the overall care of the patient because it reinforces the quality of care by promoting more accurate, efficient and quality record keeping.


Hospitals that have adopted electronic medical filing also are doing their part to save our planet by implementing eco-friendly policies and procedures.

Related Searches


Promoted By Zergnet


You May Also Like

  • Pros and Cons of a Paper Health Record

    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 created financial incentives for medical facilities to develop electronic medical records systems, as...

Related Searches

Check It Out

Are You Really Getting A Deal From Discount Stores?

Is DIY in your DNA? Become part of our maker community.
Submit Your Work!