Artificial Christmas Trees Vs. Real Christmas Trees

Each year, consumers debate the superiority of real Christmas trees vs. artificial Christmas trees.

Every Christmas season reignites the debate over the superiority of real Christmas trees versus artificial Christmas trees. Many consumers prefer buying a real tree each year, while others prefer using an artificial tree. There are advantages and disadvantages to each.

Aesthetics

Real Christmas trees give off a pine scent that artificial trees do not. However, they also lose needles, creating a mess that artificial trees do not.

Cost

An artificial tree costs more than a comparably sized real tree, but it may be used year after year. Though the artificial tree requires a greater upfront investment, it is less expensive over time than purchasing a new tree each year.

Safety

Real trees must be maintained to reduce drying, which can present a fire hazard.

Artificial trees are produced with PVC, which may produce airborne dioxins over time. The PVC is often stabilized with lead, which may break free as harmful dust as the artificial tree ages.

Convenience

Real trees require the purchase and transport of a new tree each year. Artificial trees require assembly and disassembly.

Environmental and Economic Consequences

Real trees sold in the United States are primarily grown in the United States, while artificial trees are overwhelmingly manufactured in Asia and imported into the United States. The environmental and economic impact of real trees is generally considered to be less harmful than the impact of artificial trees.

References

• American Heritage Magazine: Fake Fir
• University of Illinois: Christmas tree facts
• Duke University: Real vs. fake Christmas trees

Resources

• National Christmas Tree Association
• Christmas Tree Farm Network
• American Christmas Tree Association