Problems With Splenda Sugar Substitute

Splenda is a no calorie sugar substitute. The makers of Splenda claim that the product can be used almost anywhere natural sugar can be used to create a similar sweetening effect without any calories. However, Splenda does have several attributes that can be considered problems.

Price

Splenda is more expensive than natural sugar. People who decide to use Splenda instead of sugar may see the amount of money that they spend on sweetener increase.

Source

Though Splenda is created through a process that begins with sugar, it is not a natural product like sugar. People who maintain a natural diet, or those who try to avoid chemically enhanced or manufactured food may see this aspect of Splenda as problematic.

Conversions

Splenda can be used for baking. However, Splenda has different properties and a different level of sweetness than natural sugar. The amount of sugar called for in a recipe may not be the amount of Splenda that should be used in its place.

Baked Goods

Sugar helps maintain moisture levels in many baked goods. Since Splenda does not have the same quality, baked goods made with Splenda should be eaten or wrapped and frozen within 24 hours.

Health Concerns

Though the FDA has approved the levels of all of the ingredients used in Splenda, there is some speculation that some of the chemicals used in Splenda could potentially have some negative side effects.