In law, liability refers to legal responsibility. Businesses are liable to pay money -- called damages -- to individuals the company has wronged. Individuals who have been wronged by a company can sue the business and a court decides whether the company is liable and how much in damages liable companies must pay. Sometimes, a product causes a legal wrong, which is called product liability. Legal wrongs are called torts. Strict liability is a legal term used in tort cases where a defective or inadequate product has caused harm to a consumer.
Disadvantages for Companies
Strict liability is a type of product liability that holds the selling company liable for defective or inadequate products. Strict liability is liability without fault, meaning that the seller of the product is responsible for damages even if the tort wasn’t the company’s fault. Strict liability only applies to businesses officially engaged in selling or leasing products; private sales are not applicable. Strict liability is only enforced in some states and each state that has strict liability might have variations on the law.
Advantages for Companies
All parties in the product’s chain of distribution can be held liable for the product’s tort. This includes retailers, manufacturers, distributors and wholesalers. This means that in some cases the liable company might share or transfer the burden of damages by suing other members of the chain of distribution. However, the liable party must prove the negligent party among the members of the chain of distribution. Companies under government contract are usually exempt from strict liability tort damages.
Advantages for Consumers
Under strict liability, injured users can sue for property and personal damages. Strict liability covers the purchaser and all users of the product. Users include anyone who actively or passively enjoys the benefits of the product. Users might include the purchaser’s family, friends, neighbors or colleagues. In some cases, even bystanders can recover damages as users.
Disadvantages for Consumers
In several situations, the purchaser and users cannot sue for strict liability tort. A known “general danger” is one such situation. Sometimes, the inherent danger of a product -- such as a knife or a gun -- is general knowledge. Companies are not responsible for failing to warn consumers of generally known dangers. Companies are also not liable in situations where the consumer has misused or modified the product in such a way as to cause an injury.
- Inc.: Tort Liability Basics
- The Legal Environment of Business and Online Commerce; Henry R. Cheeseman
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Theories of Tort Law
- Photo Credit Szepy/iStock/Getty Images
Advantages and Disadvantages of Technology in Education
Technology in education has blossomed in the form of course-specific web pages, email communication, online courses, and tools used specifically in the...
The Disadvantages of Auto Insurance
The advantages of auto insurance are clear. Maintaining automotive insurance demonstrates financial responsibility. It provides peace of mind in that any bills...
Advantages and Disadvantages of Insurance
Consumers are constantly bombarded with the message they should purchase insurance to protect their homes, credit cards, health, families and even consumer...
What Are Some Advantages and Disadvantages of Using DNA Analysis to Aid Law Enforcement in Crime?
In little more than two decades, DNA profiling has become one of the most valuable tools in forensic science. By comparing highly...
The Advantages of Incorporating in Texas vs. Nevada
Targeting your prime demographic, expediting while saving costs on shipping and construction and manufacturing costs are all issues and questions that require...