Things You'll Need:
- The Scientific Method
- Common Sense
- No Faith Required
-
Step 1
I know a lot of skeptics, evolutionists, and darwinians will be reading this. Let me start off in a proper way, by using the Scientific Method to break down and disprove Evolution and Natural Selection. This is the same scientific method used by the new atheists such as Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, etc.
-
Step 2
The question at hand is a specific one: Can Evolution account for Altruism? You may think that this is a tired argument, but there is much to be considered here. It can be seen that genes can be passed on by Reciprocal Altruism using the Tit for Tat method, but does Tit for Tat cover all bases?
-
Step 3
Now it's time for the research! You may be interested to hear that certain animals in the animal kingdom show signs of altruism that does not account for genes being passed on. In fact, the Ozark Big-Eared Bat species generously donate blood to each other without ever receiving any blood in return! This takes place not only with family members, but with their bat friends that are not related and share no genes with the altruistic bat-donors at all!
-
Step 4
Testing the Hypothesis: Still hanging in there, skeptics? Let's test the hypothesis and see if there are any more confirmations of altruism that Natural Selection and Sexual Selection Selection in Evolution cannot account for! Does the hypothesis check out in hard statistics that can be verified among scholars? Yes.
-
Step 5
We can now finalize our conclusion and state our ultimate analysis of the data presented. It can be seen that the Ozark Big-Eared Bats commit acts of altruism that is not known to be reciprocated at any time, and that takes place among non-related bats that share no genes. In conclusion, the animal kingdom does indeed hold evidence against Evolution.
Comments
mazong said
on 11/10/2009 This is interesting! 5*