Step1
Render Yourself Vulnerable to Passion
This is easier said than done, as part of the difficulty lies in the very word "passion" itself. "Passion" is related to "passive" in that both English words are derived from Latin roots "passi" and "pati," which pertain to suffering and being acted upon. To suffer doesn't merely mean to "hurt", but it means to endure being acted upon. So passion is ultimately passive, something moves us from without. This runs a bit counter-intuitively to our contemporary notion that "passion comes from within." One way of reconciling this is to eschew the dichotomy, and look upon passion as a movement within that has some causation from without.
So I've emphasized the vulnerability part in this step because you can't just "become passionate" in the way you might kick-start a motorcycle. You have to take down your guard, or if that sounds too dramatic, you have to open yourself to outside forces such as texts, ideas, historical figures, writers, artists, scientists, and professors. Opening yourself in academia, rendering yourself vulnerable, isn't all that different from doing so in love. It's no accident that for instances the fields of philosophy and philology ("old school" version of linguistics) contain "phil-" in them, coming from the Greek "philia," which is one of the ancient Greek varieties of love. Open yourself to seduction.
Try to approach college in something of the way we approach kindergarten, with dilated eyes. Please see my early and experimental eHow article "How to View the World Aesthetically" for what is perhaps a more psychedelic approach to this step (linked at the bottom of the page under "Resources").
Step2
Pursue Quality Professors
Once you've opted to take the plunge and render yourself vulnerable, you might as well take advantage of your vulnerability by pursuing professors who will penetrate this vulnerability. It's false bravado to make yourself vulnerable without there being a real risk.
In my experience, especially very early experiences in academia, it's easier to go from being moved by a professor to being moved by a text or subject than vice versa. In other words, I think it's more likely that a professor will make a subject move you than it is that a subject will make a professor move you. For instance, even if you're a "science guy" (using the unisex "guy"), you might find yourself moved more by an "artsy" course that's taught by a dynamic professor than you would by a science course that's taught by a robot.
Probably the best way to find out which profs are "hot" is to ask around. Another even more accurate way is to determine if they move you by studying under them, and then repeat profs that move you and steer clear of those who don't. A way that's been developed since after I went to school is the online student reviewing of professors. Back in my days at Michigan State University (1985-91) we had a cool guy named Mark Grebner who was well past his student days (one of the more famous hippie throwbacks around campus, also a county commissioner), and he published a pamphlet called "Grading the Profs", which was a prototype to what we have now online. Today I can totally relate to what Mark was then!
Under "Resources" below I've provided links to some of the grading the profs type websites. Remember though that students can be the most biased evaluators.
Step3
Find Prof(s) Who Move You
Then, the subject matter will become that much more intoxicating. Your choice of subject matter and texts of course will depend a lot on your choice of profs. Remember though that other things remaining equal, prof trumps text. For instance, you might generally prefer modern literature to Shakespeare, but a good prof teaching Shakespeare could turn you on to "The Tempest" more so than a lackluster prof teaching James Joyce might turn you on to "Ulysses".
Your good professor's being moved by texts and subjects will rub-off on you and thus encourage you to render yourself vulnerable to the subject. If he/she is nearly orgasmic over Van Gogh, then I want it too! It's kind of like the ol' "I'll take three of whatever she's having", uttered when someone seems in a frenzy or on a high.
Step4
Participate
Participation can be in class, at office hours, on one's own (delving into texts and writing), or preferably all three. This is the ultimate in rendering oneself vulnerable, because you're literally risking yourself (your self) in the subject. You're allowing a writer, a historical period, a scientific theory, an artwork to change your life!
Through good professors teaching quality literature and/or intriguing subject matter, you will be seduced. You are the vulnerable maiden or young man, and academia is your seducer or seductress. Take the plunge now, because you may not be so free to do so later in life. Or, if you're a "non-traditional student," maybe you now have the liberty to be seduced that you either didn't have or chose not to take advantage of in your youth.
Step5
Conclusion
It is in this affair with academia that you may find, as with first love, your life changed forever--thus rendering academia anything but academic.
Comments
MichaelJMotta said
on 12/14/2007 Thanks grouch! You don't seem grouchy to me :)
I can tell I need to go to sleep soon though because I'm not following the part about the betting on the turtle. I know about the tortoise and the hare but after that I'm lost. I feel like I'm taking one of those tests where they ask what the phrase "a rolling stone gathers no moss" means to you and you come up blank - then they put you in a back ward someplace.
grouch said
on 12/14/2007 I was impressed by your aricle. So passionate in itself. I am betting on the turtle if we are racing and this renders nothing academic.