Phlebotomist Salary Comparison

Phlebotomist Salary Comparison thumbnail
A phlebotomist takes blood samples.

According to the American Society for Clinical Pathology, in March 2009 a phlebotomist was paid a median wage of $13 per hour or $27,040 per year. When comparing salaries, key factors to consider are experience, state and city of employment.

  1. Experience Comparison

    • The amount of experience has a direct impact on a phlebotomist's salary. According to September 2010 data from PayScale.com, a phlebotomist can expect to earn a median yearly salary of $20,921 to $30,496 when employed between one and four years. This increases to a median yearly salary of $24,634 to $36,674 with five to nine years of experience and $27,281 to $35,924 with 10 to 19 years of experience. A phlebotomist who has been employed for 20 or more years can expect to earn a median salary of $26,531 to $39,999 per year.

    State Rate Comparison

    • Phlebotomists who work in California earn significantly more; the median rate is $13.29 to 17.58 hourly. In comparison, one of the lower-paying states is North Carolina, where the median rate is $10.29 to $13.49 per hour. These rates reflect data from PayScale.com as of September 2010.

    City Rate Comparison

    • PayScale.com data also show that rates vary significantly among cities. For example, San Antonio, Texas is a low-paying city for a phlebotomist, as the median hourly rate there is $10.62 to $13.48. In Chicago, a higher-paying city, a phlebotomist earns $12.12 to $15.45 per hour as of September 2010.

Related Searches:

References

  • Photo Credit blood testing image by John Keith from Fotolia.com

Comments

You May Also Like

Related Ads

Featured