Copyright Laws Vs. Tech Security

Copyright Laws Vs. Tech Security thumbnail
Copyright is in general less protective of an innovator's interests than patent law.

A software innovator may have to decide: copyright or patent? One of the considerations in that decision is the extent to which one form of protection or the other actually does protect.

  1. Patents: Shorter Duration but True Monopoly

    Independent Creation Defense

    • "It's just a coincidence we're all so similar, Your Honor."
      "It's just a coincidence we're all so similar, Your Honor."

      One difference is that there is an "independent creation" defense regarding copyright. If the second person to create the same or a substantially similar work can show her creation was independent of the first person's, copyright will not bar her use of it.

    Burden of Proof

    • The defendant must generally produce evidence of independent creation, such as testimony that tracks the creative process. Once she presents a prima facie case for independence, the burden shifts back to the plaintiff to rebut it.

    Fair Use of Software

    Skepticism About the Fair-Use Doctrine

    • How far, though, does the fair-use doctrine extend in the case of software? This is a matter of continuing controversy. The General Counsel of The University of Texas System wrote: "[C]opying an entire software program even for a nonprofit educational use would be hard to justify as a fair use...."

Related Searches:

References

Resources

  • Photo Credit copyright image by YvesBonnet from Fotolia.com Big Ben clock. Clock tower image by L. Shat from Fotolia.com people image by jeancliclac from Fotolia.com children series / human values and education image by helenos from Fotolia.com

Comments

You May Also Like

Related Ads

Featured