Dual-Core Vs. Core 2 Quad

Dual-core vs. quad-core processors

Dual-core and quad-core processors are the most popular types of processors today. But which is faster, and which provides the best value?

History

Both AMD and Intel debuted dual-core processors in 2006. AMD introduced the first quad-core in 2007, with Intel following in early 2008. Although there is a difference in the number of cores, dual- and quad-core processors are based on the same architecture.

Productivity Applications

In day-to-day applications like Microsoft Word, and browsers like Internet Explorer and Firefox, there is little difference between dual- and quad-core processors. Quad-cores are faster, but the difference can only be detected when using a benchmark program.

Games

While quad-cores are technically superior for games, game developers have not been quick to program for them. As a result, many games don't see a substantial performance increase from quad-core processors.

Rendering and Video Editing

Quad-core processors are up to 50% faster in programs that handle video editing and 3D rendering. This speed advantage makes quad-core processors the best choice for professionals in these fields.

Value

AMD now offers quad-core processors for as little as $100, making them extremely affordable. Dual-cores are still the best value when looking for a budget processor, but quad-cores completely dominate the processor market over the $200 mark.

References

• Tom's Hardware: Dual Core Versus Quad Core
• Tech Report: Core i3 Takes On Athlon II (And Everything Else)