AMD Vs. Intel Microprocessor
For many computer enthusiasts, the debate between AMD and Intel microprocessors has been ongoing. Over the years, however, these processors have changed significantly. Any comparison between AMD and Intel has to take into consideration the microprocessor platform that supports it as well as the kind of work the microprocessor is expected to do. By extension, the features that surround the processor as well as the platforms also determine the performance of the processor.
Other People Are Reading
-
Application Performance
-
Running multimedia applications in a multitasking environment can work a processor to the edge. Application performance determines how a microprocessor is able to handle day-to-day standard office applications that require running an Internet application, a graphics program and a word-processing application at the same time. AMD X2 processors tend to perform better in a multitasking environment than Intel processors of the same technical features.
Gaming
-
3D gaming can determine the performance of a microprocessor. Tests are done by turning off the advanced onboard graphics chip and letting the microprocessor do the heavy lifting. In 3D gaming, the AMD X2 processor shows much superior 3D gaming performance, making it much better suited to 3D gaming.
-
Photo Editing
-
Image conversions are processor-intensive tasks that may consume a lot of processor time. AMD X2 processors tend to outperform Intel processors by giving better photo-editing performance in terms of CPU usage.
MP3 Encoding
-
Encoding audio is another processor-intensive activity. Processors have been designed to support multiple processor threads, which is important in encoding. Dual-core CPUs that support multiple threading from Intel seem to outperform AMD processors by a margin of 20 percent.
Video Encoding
-
New products such as Microsoft Media Center and other home entertainment applications that support video encoding are becoming commonplace. Video encoding scores are thus an important consideration in any comparison between the two processors. The AMD X2 and the Intel Pentium D processors seem to be statistically tied when it comes to video encoding. AMD microprocessors have maintained a consistent streak of high performance that competes well with Intel processors in this area.
Price
-
Price is determined based on the performance per the dollar spent. Generally, AMD microprocessors tend to be cheaper compared to Intel processors offering the same performance. However, the difference is minimal, usually due to the way the pricing is done. While AMD X2 chips are offered at per-individual-unit pricing, Intel processors are provided at a suggested equivalent price that is based on 1,000-unit lots.
-
References
Resources
- Photo Credit film ou numérique image by serge simo from Fotolia.com
